Eight modules, and after each one the club is left with something: an org tree, a budget, a communication plan, a handover procedure. Nobody grades you for it. You get a club that works without you.
The first question is about you. The role you actually play in the club, what you do well, and what you duck out of every time. Nobody asks you to score yourself: the competency map fills from the first activity you record.
You draw the club's structure as an org tree. Then the Graičiūnas formula counts how many relationships the president is actually holding — and it is usually too many. Units, responsibilities and a division of work you can point at follow from that.
Inside and outside — two different jobs. One so the team knows what is happening. The other so anyone sees the club at all. You agree who speaks in the club's name, on which channels, and how often.
What the club lives on. What one event really costs once you count the work somebody did for free. Who signs off a cost, and who the club has to answer to for it afterwards.
How people arrive, stay and leave: intake, tiers, role assignment. And separately, the part nobody teaches — how to let somebody go from the team and still keep them as a friend of the club.
You start preparing a successor long before your term ends. The membership standard asks for at least one documented handover cycle or an approved plan; this module is where you work out how to get there.
From “what shall we do this term” to “where is the club in three years”. Goals, priorities, and the few indicators worth tracking. Nobody grades the indicators — they are there so you notice when the direction changed.
An argument about money, a role or a direction reaches every club. Here you learn to decide when the team disagrees, and to draw the line you will not cross in advance — before the power is actually yours.
Nobody here invents the content over a cup of coffee. Clubs that hold member standing vote on every module, and the basis is real competency gaps, not somebody's hunch. So the eight subjects are settled, and sessions, dates and facilitators are published only after the vote.
Until that vote happens you will find no timetable here.
The modules are not assembled from opinions. Behind the org tree stands Graičiūnas' 1933 paper on span of control, behind the competency radar the programme's own ten domains, each with a named source, behind handover Vancil's relay model. All eight models are listed in the method section of the programme site.