What you are learning from, and how
Every gslk tool rests on a specific piece of work — from Sun Tzu and Marcus Aurelius to Graičiūnas on span of control and Ostrom on shared resources. They are collected here not so that you read them, but so that you know what to do with each one this week.
Leadership and character
How an organisation is built
You have the number. What is left is what to do with it, and the answer is almost never "work faster" — it is "group them".
The board talks only about sponsors and numbers. Then somebody asks who the club is useful to besides its own members, and the table goes quiet.
You asked, it did not happen. Before drawing conclusions about the person, four things are worth checking, and only one of them is about willingness.
You are excellent at what you can do and you avoid what you cannot — until the post requires it. The gap between what the post demands and what you do can be learned shut; it has nothing to do with character.
Impact and responsibility
Speaking, writing, negotiating
Nobody opened the invitation, and it was not because the topic was bad. Usually it contains none of the three things that make a person respond at all.
The announcement went out and half the people still ask the same question. Their attention is not the problem. The text is.
A negotiation over a room, a date or a figure turns into a contest of stubbornness. What someone asks for has one solution; why they need it has several.
Learning and teams
A new board spends its first term arguing and concludes the team is wrong. Usually the team is fine — it simply has not got past a stage that has a name.
You promised a certificate for attending, and people started coming for the certificate. Sometimes an incentive buys what you already had for free, and spoils it on the way.
Bad news arrives late not because people hide things but because your first sentence on hearing it is usually "why didn't you say so earlier".
The same work written at length: what it claims and what its evidence is worth.
