What you are learning from, and how
Every gslk tool rests on a specific piece of work — from Sun Tzu and Marcus Aurelius to Graičiūnas on span of control and Ostrom on shared resources. They are collected here not so that you read them, but so that you know what to do with each one this week.
Leadership and character
After a bad event the team spends an hour on the weather, the timetable and the other society. You will change none of those next time.
Three people did not reply, and within half an hour the team is sure they have lost interest. The fact and your version of the fact are two different things. Only one of them can be acted on.
A meeting looks free because nobody invoices you for it. Eight people for ninety minutes is twelve hours, and those hours went somewhere.
You describe yourself in adjectives — responsible, proactive. You judge other people by what they actually did. The second method works on you too.
How an organisation is built
A new board almost always starts by redoing things. Some of what it is redoing worked — nobody just said so out loud.
The task did not get done because two people assigned it, or nobody did. Both look like laziness and neither is.
One person has the social accounts, and when they go on Erasmus the club goes quiet. Trust has nothing to do with it. What is missing is an office.
You asked, it did not happen. Before drawing conclusions about the person, four things are worth checking, and only one of them is about willingness.
The day ended and nothing in the big plan moved. That is what the job actually looks like — and once you see it written down you stop blaming yourself for it.
You are excellent at what you can do and you avoid what you cannot — until the post requires it. The gap between what the post demands and what you do can be learned shut; it has nothing to do with character.
Impact and responsibility
Speaking, writing, negotiating
You prepare for a serious conversation with a sponsor or the dean's office the night before, and you prepare the wrong part. A tidy delivery with nothing behind it gives itself away in the first sentence.
The announcement went out and half the people still ask the same question. Their attention is not the problem. The text is.
Learning and teams
A project with no debrief stays an anecdote you will tell in a bar a year from now. Four questions at the end turn it into something you will do better next time.
Encouragement lasts a few hours. One genuinely difficult thing you got through lasts a year — which is why gslk asks questions instead of handing you answers.
You promised a certificate for attending, and people started coming for the certificate. Sometimes an incentive buys what you already had for free, and spoils it on the way.
The same work written at length: what it claims and what its evidence is worth.
