What you are learning from, and how
Every gslk tool rests on a specific piece of work — from Sun Tzu and Marcus Aurelius to Graičiūnas on span of control and Ostrom on shared resources. They are collected here not so that you read them, but so that you know what to do with each one this week.
Leadership and character
"Am I a leader?" is a question you will never answer honestly. "What did I do last month?" you can answer in a minute — and that is the kind of question the gslk conversations ask you.
An event fails a week before the room — on the day nobody checked what else is on at the same time. By the time people arrive, almost everything is already decided.
After a bad event the team spends an hour on the weather, the timetable and the other society. You will change none of those next time.
Three people did not reply, and within half an hour the team is sure they have lost interest. The fact and your version of the fact are two different things. Only one of them can be acted on.
A meeting looks free because nobody invoices you for it. Eight people for ninety minutes is twelve hours, and those hours went somewhere.
You describe yourself in adjectives — responsible, proactive. You judge other people by what they actually did. The second method works on you too.
How an organisation is built
The day ended and you did nothing but answer people — questions that arrived one at a time, each of them small on its own. It is not a character flaw. It is a number, and the number can be counted.
You have the number. What is left is what to do with it, and the answer is almost never "work faster" — it is "group them".
Clubs rarely die from a mistake. They die because the outgoing president leaves with everything they knew and the new one starts from an empty drive. Beginning the handover in the last week is already too late.
The board talks only about sponsors and numbers. Then somebody asks who the club is useful to besides its own members, and the table goes quiet.
A new board almost always starts by redoing things. Some of what it is redoing worked — nobody just said so out loud.
Clubs decay with nobody to blame. Power simply accumulates in one pair of hands until there is no one left who can say no.
The task did not get done because two people assigned it, or nobody did. Both look like laziness and neither is.
One person has the social accounts, and when they go on Erasmus the club goes quiet. Trust has nothing to do with it. What is missing is an office.
You asked, it did not happen. Before drawing conclusions about the person, four things are worth checking, and only one of them is about willingness.
The day ended and nothing in the big plan moved. That is what the job actually looks like — and once you see it written down you stop blaming yourself for it.
You are excellent at what you can do and you avoid what you cannot — until the post requires it. The gap between what the post demands and what you do can be learned shut; it has nothing to do with character.
Strategy and choice
Your biggest plan this term will be stopped not by a rival but by someone you never considered — an administrator, a lecturer, another club. In a club, power often sits where there is no job title.
The plan was good and half of it was eaten by small things: a locked door, a speaker who did not come, a dead microphone. That is not failure. It is the normal noise of doing anything, and you can prepare for it in advance.
There are four other clubs in your faculty and a student has one free evening a week. Whether you are good decides nothing about that evening. What you are different at decides it, and it has to fit in one sentence.
The strategic plan sits on a drive while the club lives a different life. The real strategy is wherever the money and the hours actually went.
The goal list has ten items and not one sentence about what is actually in the club's way. Without that sentence, everything else is an activity plan with a grander name.
Brand and value
You start a conversation about the club's brand and five minutes in everyone is talking about the logo. Meanwhile the club already owns five things nobody paid for, and nobody is talking about those.
Say the club's name to a stranger and watch what comes into their head. That is the club's brand. You can check it today, for nothing.
A well-run event improves the whole faculty's reputation, not just the club's. It works the other way round too. Which is why how you greet a first-year at the door belongs on the job list.
One badly welcomed first-year costs more than a semester of publicity. A club has no product it can fix separately from itself — its brand is how it behaves.
If the club defines itself by its events, it disappears the day events stop working. The question to answer is who you are for, and it is harder than it looks.
The economics of an organisation
"Where is our projector?" has no answer because the projector belongs to everyone. Anything that belongs to everyone belongs, in practice, to nobody.
Every time you ask for something from outside, you pay not only in money but in the time it takes to agree: how many messages, how many days, how many reminders. Sometimes it is cheaper to hold the job inside.
A shared room and a shared budget break with no bad people involved. It is enough that nobody wrote the rules down and nobody voted on them. A rule the group never voted on is a request.
One outside relationship — a printer, a café, a sponsor — holds up more of what the club does than anyone would like to admit. The question is simple: what happens tomorrow if they are gone.
You can be extremely busy in a club and produce nothing anyone outside it would notice. The difference between activity and result is one sentence beside each item.
A club has a business model too — an unwritten one, so half of it is wishes dressed up as facts. That difference decides everything.
A sponsor wants to transfer money and it suddenly turns out the club has no account, and possibly no legal existence. That is worth establishing before the conversation, not after.
A club with no legal entity still has a budget. It is simply written down nowhere, so every term starts from scratch and every term something is missing.
You start looking for a sponsor when the money is already needed — which means too late, and with no numbers. The first job is one page about yourselves; the letter comes after it.
Impact and responsibility
Sooner or later somebody asks what all this is for. Most boards skip that question as awkward; this work treats it as the main one.
There is one thing you would rather the next committee did not find. Until they find it, the choice is yours. After they find it, it is not.
The event will be stopped by the person nobody spoke to: whoever looks after the room, the lecturer in the next hall, the club whose date you took. There is almost always such a person, and you can almost always find them in advance.
"A responsible club" usually means one charity drive a year. There are actually four levels, and the bottom three decide more than the top one.
You close the event with one sentence about money, and everything you learned about the people and about what you threw away disappears with that sentence.
Speaking, writing, negotiating
Nobody opened the invitation, and it was not because the topic was bad. Usually it contains none of the three things that make a person respond at all.
You prepare for a serious conversation with a sponsor or the dean's office the night before, and you prepare the wrong part. A tidy delivery with nothing behind it gives itself away in the first sentence.
A club promises more in a term than it remembers. An unkept promise costs less than you think; the silence about it is what costs.
The announcement went out and half the people still ask the same question. Their attention is not the problem. The text is.
A negotiation over a room, a date or a figure turns into a contest of stubbornness. What someone asks for has one solution; why they need it has several.
Learning and teams
You led a hundred people for two years and it fits on your CV as one line nobody can check. The badge you get here can be checked: an employer opens it and sees who issued it, to whom, and what for.
A project with no debrief stays an anecdote you will tell in a bar a year from now. Four questions at the end turn it into something you will do better next time.
A new board spends its first term arguing and concludes the team is wrong. Usually the team is fine — it simply has not got past a stage that has a name.
Encouragement lasts a few hours. One genuinely difficult thing you got through lasts a year — which is why gslk asks questions instead of handing you answers.
You promised a certificate for attending, and people started coming for the certificate. Sometimes an incentive buys what you already had for free, and spoils it on the way.
Bad news arrives late not because people hide things but because your first sentence on hearing it is usually "why didn't you say so earlier".
The same work written at length: what it claims and what its evidence is worth.
